Videos
Video commentary from The Moral Decay Index on public responsibility, Christian moral reflection, and the distance between stated values and conduct. Use the reading guide below to examine the evidence behind broader questions raised by this work.
Latest Videos
Recent uploads from our channel. A video presents an argument in a particular moment; check its publication date and the original evidence before treating a factual claim as current.
The Work of Preventing Violence
October 12, 2026
Teach Conflict Skills Before Prison
October 11, 2026
Stop the Madness
October 10, 2026
When Anti Muslim Hate Enters the Church
October 10, 2026
A 15 Year Old Sentenced to 70 Years
October 10, 2026
Tragic Teen Murder Sentence How Did We Get Here
October 10, 2026
From a video argument to a checkable claim
MDI commentary asks whether institutions and individuals apply their stated principles consistently. That is a moral question. A claim about a court decision, public-health measure, or national trend also requires evidence that can be examined independently of the speaker’s conviction.
While watching, identify one factual claim and one judgment. Write them separately. For the factual claim, look for the original record, its date, and the people or places it covers. For the judgment, ask what principle is being applied and whether you would apply it to someone whose politics you share.
Reading paths for a closer look
- Trust in government: distinguish a survey of public attitudes from evidence about a specific official’s conduct.
- Media trust: trace a headline to its source and separate distrust of an institution from the accuracy of an individual story.
- Recidivism: examine why rearrest, conviction, and return to prison cannot be used interchangeably.
- Our methodology: understand why the former numerical rankings were withdrawn and what a reproducible comparison would require.
A discussion exercise
Choose a conclusion you agree with, then identify the strongest evidence that might qualify it. Ask whether that qualification changes the conclusion, narrows it, or leaves it intact. This keeps a discussion focused on reasoning rather than treating agreement as proof.
If a video contains a factual error, send its title, URL, timestamp, and the supporting source through our Contact page. Our editorial standards explain how we distinguish evidence from interpretation and handle corrections. The linked articles provide current written context; they are not transcripts of every video above.
Videos use YouTube’s privacy-enhanced embedded player. Loading or playing a video connects to YouTube; see our Privacy Policy.